Welcome to the reports and studies pages of EPC’s Engineering Ethics toolkit, produced in partnership with the Royal Academy of Engineering. Click here for the toolkit homepage.

 

Reports:

 

Studies:

Coming soon.

Do you want to champion the teaching of ethics within engineering?
Do you want to help shape the future of the Engineering Ethics Toolkit?
Do you need support with integrating ethics into your own engineering teaching?

If you answered yes to one or more of these questions, then you should join our new Ethics Ambassadors community.

Ethics Ambassadors was launched in March 2023 in order to expand and develop the work and recommendations of the Engineering Ethics Advisory Group, whose expertise and advocacy was instrumental during the creation and development of the Engineering Ethics Toolkit.

The aims of the Ethics Ambassadors community are:

An initial meeting of Ethics Ambassadors was held in June 2023 and we are currently in the process of nominating and voting for key roles within the community.

You can learn more about Ethics Ambassadors here.

To join Ethics Ambassadors, please fill out this Membership request form.

This post is also available here.

Welcome to the blog pages of EPC’s Engineering Ethics toolkit, produced in partnership with the Royal Academy of Engineering. Click here for the toolkit homepage.

These blogs provide opinion, information and updates on the Engineering Ethics Toolkit.

Personal blogs:

Information and updates:

Welcome to the Ethics Explorer, an interactive tool to help engineering educators navigate the landscape of engineering ethics education, finding their own path through what can sometimes seem like a wilderness. The Ethics Explorer is part of the Engineering Ethics Toolkit, created with support from the Royal Academy of Engineering.

If you are having issues accessing the Ethics Explorer below, please click here.
Please report any issues with the Ethics Explorer using this form.

 

In this blog, Dr Matthew Studley, Associate Professor of Technology Ethics at UWE, looks at using case studies from the Engineering Ethics Toolkit to engage students.

Over the last two years, I have been part of the team that created the Engineering Ethics Toolkit for the Engineering Professors Council and the Royal Academy of Engineering. The toolkit is based around case studies, which let students flex their ethical muscles on problems concerning a variety of applications of technology in different fields, and are structured for delivery with examples of exercises, discussion points, and further reading.

We have integrated ethics teaching into all our programmes in the School of Engineering at UWE, Bristol, and this has given me the chance to build lessons on the case studies.  I first delivered a session to around 100 Degree Apprentices from a variety of industrial backgrounds.  This was exciting!

We first warmed up by discussing how ‘ethics’ is different from ‘morals’, and I suggested that we could view ethics in some ways as like any engineering process; we’re optimising for moral good, rather than cost, strength, or some other non-functional metric.  The big difference of course is that it’s hard to determine moral value – how do we measure it?

We discussed if ideas of good and bad are culturally determined and change with time, and whether there might be any universally accepted definitions.  We agreed that it would be hard to argue against a course of action if my opinion holds the same weight as yours.  Not only is ‘good’ hard to measure, but we can’t agree what it is.  So what’s the answer?

The big revelation.  The advantage of applied ethics is that we can call upon an external standard which solves part of this problem for us, defining the behaviours and outcomes which are desirable. The Engineering Council and the Royal Academy of Engineering have created a Statement of Ethical Principles for all engineers, which gives weight to our arguments about moral worth.  We now know what ‘good’ is.

I used one of the case studies in the toolkit to frame an open discussion in the lecture theatre, with groups discussing the points suggested by the authors.  Although our students were from a variety of backgrounds, it wasn’t a disadvantage to use the same case study for all. Feedback from the module leader suggested that the students found the session enjoyable and engaging (apparently, I should do a regular podcast).

After this pilot we have delivered a similar session on a wider scale by tutors to groups of all our final year students.  My colleagues suggested that some students were less engaged. I think we might use some role-play next time; get them moving round the room, get them to use their bodies, get them to own the issues. Ethics should engage the heart!

The great biologist E. O. Wilson said, “The real problem of humanity is the following: We have Palaeolithic emotions, medieval institutions and godlike technology.” With more people, having greater resource needs, and the possibility that AI will accelerate our technological development still faster, it seems to me more important than ever to train engineers who are confident and empowered to make ethical decisions.

Please join us on Friday 31st March for our free webinar, where we will launch new case studies, case enhancements, and guidance articles, as well as giving you a first look at some of our other forthcoming features. If you would like to contribute a resource to the Engineering Ethics Toolkit, you can find out how to get involved here.

 

This blog is also available here.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

“When I started to teach ethics, many years ago now, I felt alone… today we are a community who help and support each other. Together we can make ethics in engineering the core of the way we teach and practice engineering. This is why I would like to invite you to join such a vibrant and inclusive community.”
– Raffaella Ocone, Chair of the Engineering Ethics Advisory Group

Use this form to submit a case enhancement to the EPC’s Engineering Ethics Toolkit.

You can download our contribution guidelines here. Further information can be found on our Get involved page.

Note: If you worked with co-authors, they must complete this form.

For example Sarah Jayne Hitt, Ph.D. SFHEA (NMITE, Edinburgh Napier University) or Professor Sarah Hitt (NMITE)
This will be added to our Contributors page at https://epc.ac.uk/resources/toolkit/ethics-toolkit/contributors/
Click or drag a file to this area to upload.
This will be added to our Contributors page at https://epc.ac.uk/resources/toolkit/ethics-toolkit/contributors/ alongside your bio.
Keywords are the words and phrases associated with your case enhancement that a user might search under when looking for this type of content. Please add keywords that focus on enhancement content, situation, activities, methods, marking, and so on.
Please select the type of assessment criteria or suggestions that you have included within your case enhancement.
Click or drag files to this area to upload. You can upload up to 20 files.
We need these to be uploaded separately, as we will be embedding them in a web page. Please ensure that they are of adequate resolution and size; that you have permission to use them; and that you have added any permissions, sources, credits or other details for them in the body of the case enhancement document that you are submitting.
Click or drag a file to this area to upload.
Please do a final check before uploading!
If you are unsure, please check permissions and rights before submitting.
For more details, please see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
The EPC will engage in an editorial process, and we are happy to suggest and discuss changes. We will give you the opportunity to approve the final version of this resource prior to publication.

Use this form to submit a guidance article to the EPC’s Engineering Ethics Toolkit.

You can download our contribution guidelines here. Further information can be found on our Get involved page.

Note: If you worked with co-authors, they must complete this form.

For example Sarah Jayne Hitt, Ph.D. SFHEA (NMITE, Edinburgh Napier University) or Professor Sarah Hitt (NMITE)
This will be added to our Contributors page at https://epc.ac.uk/resources/toolkit/ethics-toolkit/contributors/
Click or drag a file to this area to upload.
This will be added to our Contributors page at https://epc.ac.uk/resources/toolkit/ethics-toolkit/contributors/ alongside your bio.
We might change the title of your guidance article for marketing purposes.
Examples: "This article should be read by educators at all levels in higher education who wish to better understand ethics and its connection to engineering education. It is also useful for students who are being introduced to this topic." or "This article should be read by educators at all levels in higher education who wish to integrate ethics into the engineering and design curriculum, or into module design and learning activities. It describes an in-class activity that is appropriate for large sections and can help to provide students with opportunities to practise the communication and critical thinking skills that employers are looking for."
Keywords are the words and phrases associated with your guidance article that a user might search under when looking for this type of content. Please add keywords that focus on article content, purpose, themes, methods, and so on.
Click or drag files to this area to upload. You can upload up to 20 files.
We need these to be uploaded separately, as we will be embedding them in a web page. Please ensure that they are of adequate resolution and size; that you have permission to use them; and that you have added any permissions, sources, credits or other details for them in the body of the guidance article document that you are submitting.
Click or drag files to this area to upload. You can upload up to 3 files.
Please do a final check before uploading!
Each co-author must submit a form via this link: https://epc.ac.uk/resources/toolkit/ethics-toolkit/engineering-ethics-toolkit-co-author-confirmation/
If you are unsure, please check permissions and rights before submitting.
For more details, please see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
The EPC will engage in an editorial process, and we are happy to suggest and discuss changes. We will give you the opportunity to approve the final version of this resource prior to publication.
Let us know what you think of our website