Toolkit: Complex Systems Toolkit.

Authors: Dr. Natalie Wint (University College London); Dr. Mohammad Hassannezhad (University College London); Dr. Manoj Ravi (University of Leeds).

Topic: Complex systems competencies.

Title: Understanding complex systems competencies required in engineering graduates. 

Resource type: Knowledge article.

Relevant disciplines: Any.

Keywords: Systems thinking; Problem-solving; Critical thinking; Digital literacy; Modelling and simulation; Design; Project management; Life cycle; Risk; Collaboration; Communication; Professional conduct; Social responsibility.

Licensing: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

Downloads: A PDF of this resource will be available soon.

Learning and teaching resources:

Who is this article for?: This article should be read by educators at all levels in higher education who are seeking an overall perspective on teaching approaches for integrating complex systems in engineering education. 

Related INCOSE Competencies: Toolkit resources are designed to be applicable to any engineering discipline, but educators might find it useful to understand their alignment to competencies outlined by the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). The INCOSE Competency Framework provides a set of 37 competencies for Systems Engineering within a tailorable framework that provides guidance for practitioners and stakeholders to identify knowledge, skills, abilities and behaviours crucial to Systems Engineering effectiveness. A free spreadsheet version of the framework can be downloaded. 

AHEP mapping: This resource addresses several of the themes from the UK’s Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes fourth edition (AHEP4). 

 

Premise:

This article outlines the core competencies required for engineering students to effectively engage with complex systems. Such systems involve a range of technical and non-technical components that interact in non-linear and unpredictable ways. Working effectively with such complex systems requires collaboration across engineering disciplines, as well as other fields and stakeholder groups.  

Within AHEP4, complex problems are referred to as those which “have no obvious solution and may involve wide-ranging or conflicting technical issues and/or user needs that can be addressed through creativity and the resourceful application of engineering science” (p.26). The ability to work productively with complex systems is therefore essential for engineers and helps them address problems increasingly experienced in business and society, which have many interdependent components and lack clear or stable solutions.  

The aim of this article is to provide a foundational framework that integrates the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary for undergraduate and graduate engineering students to navigate complexity. In so doing, it serves educators, curriculum designers, and students seeking to develop the mindset and skills required to tackle the challenges of the 21st century within an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world (SEFI, 2025).  

This knowledge article, informed by the INCOSE Competency Framework for Systems Engineering (INCOSE, 2018), categorises complex systems competencies into eight core competencies. These competencies encompass mindset and foundations, technical methods and tools, management and delivery, and attributes and behaviours. The description of each competency references learning outcomes (LOs) outlined in AHEP4 (Engineering Council, 2025) and the International Engineering Alliance (IEA) Graduate Attributes (2021) to establish a common baseline for all engineering graduates (see Appendix for mapping).  

 

The eight core complex systems competencies:

1. Systems thinking and problem framing 

The ability to take a holistic approach, to consider a problem from multiple perspectives and to understand how a system’s parts interact to produce emergent behaviour.  

Students must be able to understand what makes a system ‘complex’ and move beyond narrow problem-solving to identify root causes. This involves understanding fundamental Systems thinking concepts including hierarchies and interfaces (structural dimension), holism and cause-effect (dynamic dimension), lifecycles (time dimension), and multiple perspectives (perception dimension).  

Systems thinking enables engineers to anticipate ripple effects, emergent behaviours, and trade-offs, designing solutions that remain robust under uncertainty. AHEP4 requires students to “formulate and analyse complex problems to reach substantiated conclusions” (LO2) and to “apply an integrated or systems approach to the solution of complex problems” (LO6).  

2. Critical thinking 

The ability to question assumptions, evaluate evidence, apply logical reasoning, and justify decisions based on reasoned arguments and evidence.  

Navigating complex systems involves working with a variety of (often conflicting) goals, information, and data types from across discipline and stakeholder groups. Critical thinking is thus necessary to enable engineers to identify biases, avoid oversimplification and flawed reasoning, and to make ethical, transparent and evidence-informed decisions with consideration for unintended consequences. AHEP4 requires graduates to “critically evaluate technical literature and other sources of information to solve complex problems” (LO4). 

3. Simulation, modelling and data literacy 

The ability to apply scientific, mathematical, and engineering principles to model, test, and improve complex systems.  

Working with complex systems involves a range of resources including people, data and information, tools and appropriate technologies. Students must be able to create, apply and validate system models (as physical, mathematical, or logical representation of systems) and demonstrate competence in simulation and data literacy to address uncertainty and complexity at scale. This may involve using models and data to justify assumptions, explore scenarios, predict the consequences of actions, solve difference equations, conduct sensitivity and stability analysis, and predict the probability of risk.  

This aligns with several AHEP4 outcomes: “apply mathematics, statistics, and engineering principles to solve complex problems” (LO1); “apply computational and analytical techniques while recognising limitations” (LO3); and “select and critically evaluate technical literature and other data sources” (LO4).  

4. Design for complexity and changeability 

The ability to design adaptable, robust, and resilient systems across their lifecycle.  

Changes (both planned and unplanned) are inherent in complex systems. Long-term success of a system therefore requires design for resilience to first hand/internal (by the system), second hand/external (to the system) or third hand (around the system) change. Design for complexity and changeability ensures systems can evolve and integrate new capabilities across their lifecycle.  

AHEP4 requires engineers to be able to innovatively “design solutions that meet a combination of societal, user, business and customer needs” (LO5). This may involve designing systems that deliver required functions over time, including evolution, adaptability, and integration across subsystems (capability engineering), and supports evaluation of alternatives, balance competing objectives, and justify transparent decisions (decision management).  

5. Project and lifecycle management 

The ability to plan and deliver engineering activities across the system lifecycle, ensuring outcomes are delivered on time, on cost, and with integrity.  

Complex systems involve many subsystems with various purposes and lifecycles. This necessitates effective coordination and delivery processes and a focus on early planning and lasting systemic impacts. Project and lifecycle management allows for concurrent engineering (parallelisation of tasks), and verification and validation of tasks in dynamic environments. Graduates must “apply knowledge of engineering management principles, commercial context, project and change management” (AHEP4, LO15).  

This aligns with the Engineering Attribute of Project Management and Teamwork and the INCOSE Framework competencies in Lifecycle Processes, Integration, and Project Management, emphasising coordinated delivery and long-term value creation across socio-technical systems. Lifecycle awareness prevents short-term optimisation and emphasises aspects such as maintainability, whole-life value delivery and total expenditure (TOTEX) thinking, all of which support efforts towards sustainability and net-zero.  

6. Risk and uncertainty management 

The ability to identify, assess, and manage technical, social, environmental, and ethical risks at multiple levels of complex systems.  

Complex systems are inherently uncertain, with cascading risks that must be anticipated and managed proactively. Risk management enables students to quantify source and impact of uncertainties where possible and apply precaution where uncertainty is irreducible, ensuring safety, sustainability, and governance.  

AHEP4 requires graduates to “use a structured risk management process to identify, evaluate and mitigate risks (the effects of uncertainty)” (LO9), ranging from project-specific challenges to systemic threats, which need to “adopt a holistic and proportionate approach to the mitigation of security risks” (LO10).  

7. Collaboration and communication 

The ability to work effectively across disciplines, boundaries, and cultures, while conveying complex insights clearly to technical and non-technical audiences. 

Complex systems challenges cannot be solved by individuals alone and include consideration for stakeholders across industry, policy and society. Such collaborative processes involve participatory problem-solving, learning from others, inclusive communication, and negotiation and persuasion strategies, all of which necessitate emotional intelligence.  

AHEP4 expects graduates to “function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader of a team, being able to evaluate own and team performance” (LO16). They must be able to influence stakeholder decisions, foster alignment, and shape outcomes across industry, policy, and society (AHEP4, LO17).  

8. Professional responsibility 

The ability to apply professional and societal responsibilities in decision-making, with awareness of ethical implications and long-term impacts and unintended consequences of engineered systems.  

Engineers increasingly work on complex systems that shape lives, societies, and ecosystems. Ethical responsibility ensures that technical competence aligns with social good and involves consideration for trade-offs between factors including environmental impact, affordability and social acceptance. This aligns with AHEP4, IEA, and INCOSE principles on ethics, professionalism, and leadership, ensuring engineers act responsibly within complex systems and contribute positively to society and sustainability. AHEP4 requires graduates to “identify and analyse ethical concerns and make reasoned ethical choices informed by professional codes of conduct” (LO8) and “evaluate the environmental and societal impact of solutions to complex problems” (LO7).  

 

Conclusions:

This article defines a set of eight integrated competencies that prepare engineering graduates to navigate complex systems. Together, they combine knowledge (what graduates must know), skills (what they can do), and attitudes (how they behave and think). Embedding these competencies requires project-based learning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and reflective exercises, while assessment should include portfolios, teamwork, and scenario analysis. Employers and professional bodies can reinforce these competencies through mentoring, internships, and early career development. 

By aligning with INCOSE, AHEP4, and IEA GA frameworks (see Appendix for mapping), this guidance provides an internationally consistent foundation that can be adapted to local contexts, equipping engineering graduates to address complex, interdependent challenges of the 21st century with competence, integrity, and resilience.  

 

Appendix:  

Mapping between Eight Core Competencies and Standard frameworks 

Proposed Core Competency   INCOSE * AHEP4 ** IEA GA *** 
Systems Thinking & Problem Framing ST LO2, LO6 WA2
Critical Thinking   CT LO4 WA4, WA11 
Simulation, Modelling & Data Literacy  IM, SM  LO1, LO3, LO4  WA1, WA4, WA5
Design for Complexity & Changeability  CP, DM, DF LO5  WA3 
Project & Lifecycle Management   LC, PL, CE, CP  LO15  WA10 
Risk & Uncertainty Management  CE, PL, RO  LO9, LO10 –
Collaboration & Communication   CC, TD, TL, EI  LO16, LO17  WA8, WA9 
Professional Responsibility  EI, EP  LO7, LO8  WA6, WA7 

 

* INCOSE Competency Framework, 2nd edition (2018) 

** AHEP4 Learning Outcome (LO) (2025) 

*** International Engineering Alliance (IEA) Graduate Attributes (GA) (2021) 

 

CC = Communications 

CE = Concurrent Engineering  

CP = Capability Engineering 

CT = Critical Thinking 

DF = Design For … 

DM = Decision Management 

EI = Emotional Intelligence 

EP = Ethics and Professionalism 

IM = Information Management 

 LC = Life Cycle 

LO = Learning Outcome 

PL = Planning 

RO = Risk and Opportunity Management 

TD = Team Dynamics 

TL = Technical Leadership 

SM = Systems Modelling and Analysis 

ST = Systems Thinking 

WA = Washington Accord 

 

References:

 

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.  

Toolkit: Complex Systems Toolkit.

Author: Dr. Rhythima Shinde (KLH Sustainability).

Topic: Applying Cynefin framework for climate resilience.  

Title: Managing floods in urban infrastructure.

Resource type: Teaching – Case study.

Relevant disciplines: Civil engineering; Environmental engineering; General engineering.

Keywords: Systems thinking; Climate change; Sustainability; Risk; Decision-making; Problem-solving; Disaster mitigation.

Licensing: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

Related INCOSE Competencies: Toolkit resources are designed to be applicable to any engineering discipline, but educators might find it useful to understand their alignment to competencies outlined by the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). The INCOSE Competency Framework provides a set of 37 competencies for Systems Engineering within a tailorable framework that provides guidance for practitioners and stakeholders to identify knowledge, skills, abilities and behaviours crucial to Systems Engineering effectiveness.  A free spreadsheet version of the framework can be downloaded.

This resource relates to the Systems Thinking, Requirements Definition, Communication, Design For, and Critical Thinking INCOSE Competencies. 

AHEP4 mapping: This resource addresses several of the themes from the UK’s Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes fourth edition (AHEP4):  Analytical Tools and Techniques (critical to the ability to model and solve problems), and Integrated / Systems Approach (essential to the solution of broadly-defined problems). In addition, this resource addresses the themes of Sustainability and Communication. 

Educational level: Beginner; intermediate.

 

Acknowledgement: 

The case study underpinning this teaching activity was developed by Prof. Kristen MacAskill (University of Cambridge). The Module was ​first ​developed and implemented in teaching by TEDI- London, led ​by a team​ of learning technologists, Ellie Bates, Laurence Chater, Pratishtha Poudel, and academic member, Rhythima Shinde. This work was carried out in collaboration with the Royal Academy of Engineering through its Engineering X programme — a global partnership that supports safer, more sustainable engineering education and practice worldwide. With critical support from Professor Kristen MacAskill and involvement of Ana Andrade and Hazel Ingham, Aisha Seif Salim. This was a collective effort involving many individuals across TEDI-London and RAEng (advisors and reviewers), and while we cannot name everyone here, we are deeply grateful for all the contributions that made this module possible. 

 

Learning and teaching notes: 

This case study introduces a structured, systems-thinking–based teaching resource. It provides educators with tools and frameworks—such as the Cynefin framework and stakeholder mapping—to analyse and interpret complex socio-technical challenges. By exploring the case of the Queensland, Australia floods, it demonstrates how engineering decisions evolve within interconnected technical and social systems, helping students link theory with practice. 

The Cynefin framework (Nachbagauer, 2021; Snowden, 2002), helps decision-makers distinguish between different types of problem contexts—simple, complicated, complex, chaotic, and disordered. In an engineering context, this framework guides learners to recognise when traditional linear methods work (for simple or complicated problems) and when adaptive, experimental approaches are required (for complex or chaotic systems). 

Within this teaching activity, Cynefin is used to help students understand how resilience strategies evolve when facing uncertainty, incomplete information, and changing stakeholder dynamics. By mapping case study events to the Cynefin domains, learners gain a structured way to navigate uncertainty and identify appropriate modes of action. 

This case study activity assumes basic familiarity with systems concepts and builds on this foundation with deeper application to real-world socio-technical challenges.  

 

Summary of context:

The activity focuses on a case study of 2010–2011 floods in Queensland, Australia, which caused extensive damage to urban infrastructure. The Queensland Reconstruction Authority (QRA) initially directed resources to short-term asset repairs but subsequently shifted towards long-term resilience planning, hazard management, and community-centred approaches. 

The case resonates with global engineering challenges, such as flood, fire, and storm resilience, and can be easily adapted to local contexts. This case therefore connects systems thinking theory directly to engineering and governance decisions, illustrating how frameworks like Cynefin can support engineers in navigating uncertainty across technical and institutional domains. 

 

Learning objectives:

Aligned with AHEP4 (Engineering Council, 2020) – Outcomes 6, 10, and 16 on systems approaches, sustainability, and risk – this activity emphasises systems thinking, stakeholder engagement, problem definition, and decision-making under uncertainty. 

This teaching activity introduces learners to the principles and practice of systems thinking by embedding a real-world case study into engineering education (Godfrey et al., 2014; Monat et al.,2022). The objectives are to: 

 

Teachers have the opportunity to: 

 

Downloads: 

 

Learning and teaching resources:

 

Time required: 

The teaching activity is designed for 4–6 hours of structured learning, delivered across three modules: 

1. Context (1–2 hours) 

2. Analysis and insights (1–2 hours) 

3. Discussion and transferable learning (1–2 hours) 

 

Materials required:

1. Open access online learning platform: Engineering for a complex world

This dedicated platform hosts the interactive modules designed for this teaching activity. Students progress through three modules — Context, Analysis and Insights, and Discussion and Transferable Learning. Each module includes animations, narrative-driven content, scenario prompts, and interactive tasks. The platform ensures flexibility: it can be used in fully online, hybrid, or face-to-face settings. All necessary digital assets (readings, maps, videos, and quizzes) are embedded, so learners have a “one-stop” environment.

2. Case study pack: Queensland Reconstruction Authority flood response

The core teaching narrative is anchored in this Engineering X case study. It documents the evolution of the Queensland Reconstruction Authority (QRA) from a short-term flood recovery body to a long-term resilience institution. This resource provides students with authentic socio-technical detail — including stakeholder conflicts, institutional learning, and systemic barriers — which they then interrogate using systems thinking frameworks.

3. Facilitator’s guide: (Appendix A)

This guide equips educators to deliver the course consistently and effectively. It includes:

4. Timeline touchpoints: (Appendix B)

This resource provides a suggested delivery schedule for facilitators. It maps when live sessions, asynchronous tasks, and group discussions should occur, ensuring students remain engaged over the course. It also indicates where key reflective points and assessments (both formative and summative) can be integrated.

5. Pre- and post-module assessment form: (Appendix C)

This tool evaluates students’ systems thinking learning outcomes. It includes:

The form provides both quantitative data (Likert scales) and qualitative insights (open-ended reflections), enabling robust evaluation of teaching impact. 

 

Assessment:

 

Narrative of the case:

Learners are introduced to the case via a fictional guide, “Bernice,” who frames the scenario and supports navigation through the material. Students work through three stages that progressively apply the Cynefin framework and other systems tools to understand how resilience emerges through evolving governance and engineering responses: 

1. Context module: 

2. Analysis & insights module: 

3. Discussion & transfer learning module: 

 

Interactive learning design:

The teaching activity integrates multiple interactive elements to immerse students in systems thinking: 

 

Why this approach adds value: 

Although rooted in social-technical interactions, the activity explicitly connects systems thinking to core engineering design competencies—problem framing, stakeholder analysis, and iterative solution development under uncertainty 

 

Guided questions and activities: 

Facilitators can use these prompts to stimulate inquiry and structured reflection: 

 

Opportunities for extension: 

In addition to the Queensland floods and Sakura Cove examples, educators may draw parallels with urban heat planning in London, wildfire adaptation in Australia, or storm resilience in the Netherlands. These comparative cases allow learners to generalise systems insights beyond one event or geography. 

The activity is designed to be scalable and adaptable: 

This flexibility allows educators to tailor the activity to their students’ level of expertise, institutional context, and disciplinary focus. 

 

References:

 

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.  

Toolkit: Complex Systems Toolkit.

Author: Mariam Makramalla, PhD, FRSA (New Giza University).

Topic: Integrating complex systems learning outcomes in engineering curricula.

Title: How to scaffold complex systems learning outcomes across a curriculum.

Resource type: Guidance article.

Relevant disciplines: Any.

Keywords: Learning outcomes; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Curriculum map; Critical thinking; Problem-solving; Life cycle; Decision-making . 

Licensing: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

Downloads:

Who is this article for?: This article should be read by educators at all levels of higher education looking to embed and integrate complex systems topics into curriculum, module, and / or programme design.   

 

Premise:  

Teaching and learning engineering carries with it a double layer of complexity. On the one hand, this complexity is connected to the growing interdisciplinary nature of engineering itself. On the other hand, the complexity is connected to the growing diversity of engineering students that are often present in one project team. This multifaceted complexity requires a re-envisioned understanding of the role and purpose of the engineering educator.  

With the growing trend of a global classroom reality, we often find that learners in the classroom are representing different cultures, which in turn are rooted in them unconsciously carrying historical and socio-cultural baggage relating to these cultures. Thus, it becomes crucial to unpack the challenge and potential that such a diverse collective intelligence can offer to an engineering learning experience.  

As our understanding of the engineering discipline gets more rooted and interconnected with the precarious reality that our world is witnessing today, it becomes essential that the engineering education community would take up a proactive role in actively contributing to the formation of engineering citizenship. In other words, every engineering student should be educated as a citizen that has mastered the engineering cross-cutting fields in such a way that they are free to create and solve problems of the present and the future.  

With this in mind, it becomes very clear that the one-size-fits all model of a single discipline engineering classroom can no longer sustain itself. It does not factor in the richness that a diverse student body can offer, and it dilutes the value and potential of an engineering learner to think clearly or solve problems. It is therefore imperative that engineering educators grasp the complex reality of an integrated engineering discipline and address it in a way that fosters scaffolding of diverse knowledge. Some students might specialise in one core technical discipline. Yet, future projections for most students showcase the need to have a wide level of exposure to broader competency development. Students need to learn to understand the field of engineering at large and to develop system thinking skills that enable them to exist, challenge and have an impact on the system that they are a part of.  

 

How to scaffold learning outcomes in a complex engineering curriculum:

The below table has been designed for embedding Complex Systems Learning Outcomes across an engineering curriculum. It maps against competencies and suggests scaffolding techniques across educational levels. It is also important to note, that efforts need to be made to align to the relevant AHEP requirements or other accreditation standards. Table 1 presents the different strands of the Complex Systems Engineering Curriculum, colour coded in line with the INCOSE Competency Framework outline (INCOSE, 2025). Table 2 presents a practical guide for educators to scaffold Complex Systems learning outcomes across a curriculum. The intention is for the scaffolding framework to compare the trade-offs between different elements of the competency group. For example, system modelling and analysis as an element from the core competency and planning from the management competency. The table suggests activities that would integrate different competencies together in a scaffolded approach.  

Table 1. Competency Areas for Complex Systems (INCOSE, 2025).

Table 1 presents Competency Areas for Complex Systems. As mentioned, the skills range to include a wide variety of competencies, thereby enabling a solid and grounded systems thinking approach for students. As students approach their learning, they go through a series of development stages that gradually build up student level of expertise until they reach the stage of what the INCOSE competency framework refers to as a lead practitioner role. Building on the competencies of the complex system toolkit presented in Table 1, Table 2 presents a potential outline for a scaffolding framework that maps varying threads of the framework in a way that enables scaffolded activities at every developmental stage for learners. Depending on the learning context and educational level, educators can choose which level of attainment is appropriate to their curriculum.  

Table 2. Scaffolding Complex Systems Learning Outcomes across the curriculum 

 

Discussion and next steps:

As we are approaching the fuzzy front end to complexity in engineering pedagogy, as educators we need to be constantly toggling between devising frameworks, being informed by literature, contextualising ideas, validating these in our classrooms and repeating this cycle to continually fine-tune our complex teaching navigational complexity framework. The invitation is open for all educators who would like to connect as we continue to explore different ways of developing responsible engineers who leave a lasting and sustainable mark transforming their stationed realities.  

 

References:

   

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.  

 

Objectives: To equip learners with the skills to successfully navigate digital and traditional recruitment processes for engineering roles. This includes demonstrating EDI, technical, and employability skills using the STAR framework; tailoring CVs for AI and Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS); and preparing for aptitude and abstract reasoning tests through targeted practice to enhance problem-solving and analytical abilities.

Introduction: Large national and international employers use digital application processes to recruit graduates. These digital applications aim to capture personal details, education, and work experience. Reflect on your experiences to demonstrate your EDI, employability, and technical skills applied using the STAR (Situation, Technique, Action, and Result) framework. Smaller and medium enterprises typically seek cover letters and CVs. 

Topic: Navigating digital recruitment in engineering: CVs, AI, and aptitude tests.

Keywords: Equity Diversity and Inclusion; Employability and skills; Problem solving; Assessment criteria or methods and tools; CVs and cover letters; Digitalisation; Artificial intelligence; Information and Digital literacy; Communication; Technical integration; Writing skills; Inclusive or Responsible design; Neurodiversity; Curriculum or Course; Computer science; Computing; Engineering professionals; Professional development; Recruitment; Digital engineering tools; Business or trade or industry; Workplace culture

 

Master the art of applying for engineering computing jobs

In the video below, Professor Anne Nortcliffe explains how to develop expertise in securing engineering computing positions by demonstrating technical proficiency and employability skills through well-supported, evidence-based responses.

Video summary:

Master the art of applying for engineering computing jobs by showcasing both technical and employability skills through evidence-based responses. 

Key insights:

⚙️AI in hiring: Understanding that many companies use AI for initial screenings emphasizes the need for clear, evidence-based answers in applications. 

✏️Individual contributions: Highlighting personal achievements rather than team efforts showcases leadership and initiative, key traits employers seek. 

💡Interpersonal skills: Employers value teamwork and leadership; demonstrating how you’ve influenced others highlights your potential as a valuable team member. 

💬Diversity matters: Bringing unique social perspectives into projects can lead to more inclusive solutions, making your application stand out. 

⭐STAR methodology: Using the STAR method helps structure your experiences into compelling narratives, making it easier for employers to assess your qualifications. 

🗒️Tailored applications: Customising your CV and cover letter for each job application reflects your genuine interest and ensures relevance to the employer’s needs. 

📚Professional etiquette: Ending your application with gratitude and a clear call to action maintains professionalism and shows your enthusiasm for the role. 

 

AI and Applications

To navigate digital recruitment, it’s crucial to understand AI’s role in candidate screening. Tailor your CV to pass AI and Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) using resources that provide insights into keywords, formatting, and strategies. This enhances your visibility and competitiveness in the digital recruitment process. 

Further links to look at:

Please note that after clicking these links, you will need to create a free account on the external website to access the materials.

 

CV and Covering Letter

CV templates to support students and graduates to stand out and highlight their engineering and technology capabilities, especially when applying to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) that do not use AI recruitment tools.

  1. CV template – Word 
  2. CV template – Publisher 
  3. CV template – Publisher with Advice 

For applications to large corporations that use AI recruitment tools, it is recommended:

 

Aptitude and Abstract Reasoning Test 

If your digital application is successful you will be typically invited to complete an aptitude and abstract reasoning tests to evaluate candidates. To excel, practice brain training exercises and brain teasers to enhance problem-solving, critical thinking, and analytical skills. Regular practice with similar questions boosts confidence and performance, improving your chances of passing these tests and standing out in the recruitment process. 

Further links to look at:

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.


Objectives: This activity aims to equip students with strategies to thrive in video interviews.

Introduction: Our mission is to empower students with tips to excel in video interviews. This interactive challenge provides tailored advice to leverage your strengths and navigate digital recruitment challenges. Get expert guidance for in-person, video, and telephone interviews with recruiters. Learn about optimal lighting, assessment centres, and holistic interview practices. 

Topic: Mastering video and virtual interview skills with inclusive preparation strategies.

Keywords: Neurodiversity; Equity Diversity and Inclusion; Interviews; Recruitment; CVs and cover letters; Digitalisation; Communication; Employability and skills; Accessibility; Professional development; Professional conduct; Digital engineering tools; Artificial intelligence; Virtual Learning Environment; Personal or professional reputation; Student support; Technology; Assessment criteria or methods and tools; Bias.

 

How to optimise your interview setup and presence

Watch our featured video from Wenite (below) for expert tips on optimising your interview setup and presence.  

Video summary:

Being well-prepared for job interviews is essential for making strong impressions, boosting confidence, and gaining a competitive edge.  

 

Highlights: 

🎯 Importance of preparation: Crucial for first impressions and confidence.  

👔 In-person tips: Dress appropriately, mind body language, and plan travel.  

💻 Virtual interview prep: Ensure tech works, choose a quiet space, and test the platform.  

📞 Phone interview strategies: Use notes wisely, maintain vocal clarity, and avoid distractions.  

🌟 STAR technique: A framework for answering behavioural questions effectively.  

🏢 Research the company: Align your values and goals with the organisation to show genuine interest.  

❓ Prepare questions: Have smart, relevant questions ready for the interviewer.  

 

Key insights :

🔍 First impressions matter: A strong initial impression can set the tone for the entire interview, making preparation vital.  

💪 Confidence through practice: Thorough preparation helps articulate thoughts clearly, enhancing confidence during interviews.  

🏆 Competitive edge: Detailed preparation allows candidates to showcase unique skills and experiences, differentiating them from others.  

🎥 Adapt to formats: Each interview type requires a tailored approach, from dressing well for in-person to testing tech for virtual formats.  

📖 Utilise the STAR technique: This adaptable framework helps structure responses to behavioural questions, ensuring clarity and relevance.  

🌐 Company research is critical: Understanding the company’s values and strategies can help align your responses and demonstrate genuine interest.  

❓ Engaging questions matter: Thoughtful questions reflect your interest in the role and provide insights into the company culture and expectations.  

 

Lights, camera, action!

A profile picture or video interview is often your first impression on a potential employer. Ensure you convey professionalism, approachability, and confidence, especially with proper lighting for accurate representation. AI tools can optimise your appearance by adjusting lighting and camera settings for accurate colour representation, helping you present your best self.  

Further links to look at:

 

Neurodiversity   

When preparing for a job interview, ensure the process is accessible to all candidates by requesting reasonable adjustments, like receiving interview questions beforehand. Approach employers with confidence and professionalism, clearly explaining how these adjustments will help you perform at your best. Proactively advocating for such adjustments fosters a more inclusive environment for all applicants.  

Further links to look at:

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.


Objectives: This activity aims to raise awareness of language’s impact in professional settings, particularly for underrepresented groups. Students will explore verbal and non-verbal communication to foster an inclusive environment. Students will receive strategies for handling challenging situations and building confidence in interactions with leaders, and managing conflicts.

Introduction: This activity explores how language, both verbal and non-verbal, impacts professional settings, particularly for underrepresented groups. Through video insights and practical strategies, students will learn to navigate difficult conversations, address microaggressions, and build confidence in communicating with leaders. The activity also highlights the role of gendered language in interviews and recruitment, encouraging inclusive and self-aware communication in the workplace.

Topic: Building confidence and inclusion through mindful communication in the workplace.

Keywords: Equity, Diversity and Inclusion; Communication; Students; Mentoring; Job or career impact; Early careers; Engineering professionals; Curriculum or course; Personal or professional reputation; Societal impact; Social responsibility; Corporate social responsibility; Higher education institutions; Apprenticeships or work based learning; Leadership or management; Gender.

 

Navigating difficult workplace conversations 

In the video below, Abisola Ajani, a process technology engineer and founder of BW, highlights the critical role of communication skills in effectively navigating challenging workplace conversations.

Video summary: 

Abisola Ajani, a process technology engineer and founder of BW, emphasises the importance of skills for navigating difficult workplace conversations. 

Key insights:

💡 Importance of communication skills: Effective communication in engineering helps convey expertise and resolve conflicts, making it vital for career success. 

⏸️ Power of pausing: Taking a moment to pause during tough conversations allows for clearer thinking and more productive responses, promoting better outcomes. 

🤝 Role of mentorship: Seeking guidance from mentors equips individuals with strategies and confidence to tackle challenging discussions, enhancing professional growth. 

🤔 Valuing past experiences: Skills gained from previous jobs, even in unrelated fields, can be leveraged in engineering roles, demonstrating that every experience contributes to personal development. 

✨ Growth through mistakes: Embracing the inevitability of mistakes in difficult conversations encourages continuous improvement and resilience in professional settings. 

🌍 Diversity and inclusion: An inclusive environment empowers individuals to express their authentic selves, leading to greater innovation and collaboration within teams. 

💪 Empowerment through visibility: Initiatives like BW highlight the importance of representation in engineering, inspiring future generations of diverse engineers to thrive. 

 

 

Resources: 

Thriving Together Series:  Strengthening Diversity and Inclusion through Communication 

This resource emphasizes communication’s role in fostering diversity and inclusion at work. It covers: 

 

 

“I” versus “We” 

Interviews can be stressful, often reinforcing learned gender habits in language use. Women tend to use “We” instead of “I” for work they have done, and use hedge words like “think” due to societal expectations of modesty and humility. Men, on the other hand, typically use “I” and fewer hedge words, reflecting societal norms of assertiveness and leadership. 

If you catch yourself using “We” when you mean “I,” pause and correct it, but explain it’s a habit from societal norms. Both “We” and “I” answers are important: “We” for teamwork, “I” for leadership and initiative. 

Employers we recommend you recognise that “We” and “I” can be interchangeable for many women and some cultures, and understand the biases involved. 

 

 

Gender Decoder

The Gender Decoder analyses job descriptions to identify and correct gendered language, promoting gender-neutrality and inclusivity in recruitment. Try it to see how small language changes can foster a more inclusive work environment. 

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.


Objectives: Enhance your profile and personal brand with a strong CV, Cover Letters, and LinkedIn presence. This initiative aims to equip you with the skills to create CVs and LinkedIn profiles that reflect your unique identity and adhere to Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) standards. Our objective is to help underrepresented groups highlight their skills and experiences, ensuring their job applications are compelling and impactful. 

Introduction: This activity is designed to help you strengthen your personal brand by developing impactful CVs, cover letters, and LinkedIn profiles that reflect your unique identity. With a focus on Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI), you’ll gain practical tips for presenting your skills and experiences in a way that resonates with employers and promotes inclusive values in the workplace.

Topic: How to build your personal brand with inclusive CVs, cover letters, and LinkedIn profiles.

Keywords: Equity, Diversity and Inclusion; CVs and cover letters; Employability and skills; Personal or professional reputation; Communication; Writing skills; Recruitment; Professional conduct; Digitalisation; Business or trade or industry; Ethical awareness; Inclusive or Responsible design; Networking.

 

Enhance your CV, cover letters, and LinkedIn presence

Wenite Video offers resources to help you create EDI-focused CVs and LinkedIn profiles. This includes expert advice and strategies for underrepresented groups, ensuring your job materials highlight your unique identity and skills. 

Video summary:

Tolu Osobu-Gabbie shares tips on creating a robust CV, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile, emphasizing the importance of diversity and inclusion in the workplace. 

Key insights:

📝 Structured CVs: A well-structured CV enhances readability, making it easier for recruiters to assess qualifications quickly. This can significantly increase your chances of being noticed. 

🔍 Tailored applications: Customising your CV for each job with relevant keywords can align your skills with the employer’s needs, making you a more attractive candidate. 

📈 Quantification matters: Using numbers to demonstrate your achievements can capture attention and convey the impact of your contributions effectively. 

🌟 Strong opening in cover letters: Starting with a personal story can create a memorable first impression and establish a connection with recruiters. 

🚀 Highlight key Skills: Focusing on two to three relevant skills in your cover letter allows you to showcase your strengths without overwhelming the reader. 

🌍 Mutual values: Demonstrating how your values align with those of the company can strengthen your application and show that you’re a good cultural fit.

🔗 LinkedIn optimisation: An updated LinkedIn profile enhances visibility to recruiters, and using keywords can improve your chances of being found for desired roles. 

 

 

Resources:

LinkedIn profiles

Learn the requirements and best practices for EDI-compliant CVs and LinkedIn profiles to effectively communicate your unique background to employers. 

Leverage LinkedIn’s multimedia features like reels, photos, and watermarked PDF documents to enhance your profile. Strategic use of elements can make your profile stand out, increase credibility and highlight your technical and employability skills: 

 

 

Further links to look at: 

 

 

Creating a portfolio on Linkedin:

Jessica Norton from UMass Amherst Career Development & Professional Connections HUB walks through how to set up a LinkedIn Portfolio to heighten visibility of your professional projects!

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.


Objectives: This activity is our guide to navigating assessment centres, offering tips and strategies tailored to empower underrepresented groups and help you be prepared, authentic self, stand out and succeed. 

Introduction: Assessment centres have been a key part of graduate recruitment since the 1950s, originally developed to evaluate leadership potential in military officers. Today, they are widely used by employers to assess candidates through group tasks, interviews, and individual exercises. This activity serves as a practical guide to help you navigate assessment centres with confidence. With a focus on empowering underrepresented groups, it provides tips and strategies to help you prepare effectively, present your authentic self, and stand out in a competitive selection process.

Topic: Standing out with confidence at assessment centres: a guide to preparation, authenticity, and success.

Keywords: Problem solving; Employability and skills; Communication; Leadership or management; Collaboration; Digitalisation; Professional development; Writing Skills; Equity, Diversity and Inclusion; Neurodiversity; Inclusive or Responsible design; Recruitment; Business or trade or industry; Workplace culture; Information and Digital literacy; Artificial Intelligence.

 

An immersive experience

Getting startedWhat to expect An employer’s guide What are assessment centre activities?

Click on each accordion tab to explore videos that guide you through navigating assessment centres, offering tips and strategies designed to empower underrepresented groups and help you prepare, be your authentic self, stand out, and succeed.

Video summary: 

This video was produced by The Careers Chat, a platform associated with Warwick University, provides an overview of assessment centres used by graduate recruiters. It discusses various tasks designed to evaluate candidates’ skills in action, offering insights into the selection process and tips for preparation.  

Key insights: 

🌟 Always be mindful that you’re being assessed – from the moment you arrive until you leave. Maintain a professional and approachable demeanor to leave a lasting positive impression. 

🤝 View fellow candidates as collaborators, not competitors. Respect their perspectives and engage in teamwork; remember, it’s possible that everyone could be offered a role. 

💼 Keep in mind that the tasks are tailored to the role you’re applying for. Be authentic, and the skills you’ve already highlighted in your application will naturally stand out. 

Video summary:

Assessment centres are crucial for graduate recruitment, involving various tasks to evaluate candidates’ skills through collaborative activities.

Key insights:

🎓 Real-time evaluation: Assessment centres provide an opportunity for recruiters to observe candidates in action; skills, interpersonal dynamics and teamwork.

📅 Duration and format flexibility: Be prepared and mentally ready for either a half-day or full-day assessment face to face or online.

📝 Diverse assessment tasks: Wide range of tasks, from essays to presentations, means candidates should practice and be adaptable to showcase different skills.

🤝 Collaboration over competition: Viewing fellow candidates as collaborators rather than competitors can foster a supportive atmosphere, better outcomes for everyone.

🌈 Authenticity matters: Presenting genuine skills and authentic experiences rather than trying to fit a mould can make candidates stand out and connect with recruiters.

🚪 Professionalism is key: From the moment you arrive until you leave, maintaining a professional demeanour leaves a lasting impression, and suitability for the role.

💡 Preparation is essential: Familiarising oneself with the specific tasks related to the job application can boost confidence and performance, and draw upon relevant skills.

Video summary:
An assessment centre evaluates candidates through various exercises to assess teamwork, problem-solving, and fit within the company culture.

Key insights:

🔍 Assessment centres are designed to simulate real work environments, helping employers see how candidates fit into team dynamics and your ability to collaborate.

🧠 Psychometric tests may be retaken during the assessment, so candidates should be prepared to demonstrate their logical reasoning and numerical skills in person.

🗣️ Group exercises focus on problem-solving as a team, the process is more important than the outcome, opportunity to show your communication and leadership skills.

🎤 Presentations, whether in groups or individually, evaluate public speaking and the ability to synthesize complex information into clear solutions.

🎭 Role-play exercises test candidates’ client-handling skills and ability to provide solutions under pressure, highlighting their problem-solving approach.

🤝 Lunch and breaks are part of assessment, are an opportunity to network, and demonstrate your informal communication skills that could influence your success

📊 You need to demonstrate understanding and applying the company’s core values and meeting their desired competencies effectively throughout the process.

 

Resources

 

Underrepresented groups preparing for virtual assessment centres 

 

How to PASS an assessment centre UK

The video offers tailored guidance specifically for international students.

 

Acing virtual assessment centres: future you webinar: 

As part of their Future You webinar series, Prospects hosted a session titled Acing Virtual Assessment Centres on Tuesday, 20th April 2021. The webinar offers valuable insights, practical tips, and expert guidance to help students confidently navigate virtual assessment centres. Watch the video below to gain useful strategies and boost your preparation. Aldi, Arcadis and Police Now Recruiters advice for preparing for Virtual Assessment centres.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.


Objectives: EDI Quest is an interactive game designed to deepen your understanding of Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) in the workplace. This immersive experience consolidates EDI concepts into a single adventure, challenging you to reflect and apply your knowledge to solve real-world scenarios. 

Introduction: This interactive learning experience brings Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) principles to life through gameplay. As you navigate real-world workplace scenarios, you’ll be challenged to apply your knowledge, make thoughtful decisions, and reflect on the impact of inclusive practices. This activity is designed to make learning about EDI engaging, practical, and memorable.

Topic: An interactive game-based resource that helps students explore and apply Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) principles through real-world workplace scenarios.

Keywords: Equity, Diversity and Inclusion; Inclusive or Responsible design; Communication; Employability and skills; Professional development; Problem solving; Digitalisation; Information and Digital literacy.

How it works: In EDI Quest, you’ll face challenges and scenarios mirroring real-life workplace situations. Each level tests your EDI knowledge, offering instant feedback and learning opportunities. For an optimal experience, we encourage you to engage with this academic game alongside others. It is designed to be played collaboratively, so we recommend involving a friend, colleague, professor, or even a parent. Playing in pairs or groups will enhance your learning experience and provide valuable perspectives and insights that you might not gain when playing in isolation

System requirements: EDI Quest is accessible on most web browsers and devices. For the best experience, use the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, or Safari on mobile, desktop, or laptop. 

How to access the game: Displayed below is the “Level Up EDGE” page. To access the game, please navigate to the “Interactive” tab within the page interface. To enhance your gameplay experience, adjust your browser’s zoom level as needed.

 

EDI quest


We’re excited to share that the EDI Quest game is currently being enhanced. Please check back soon to experience the new and improved version! In the meantime, you can download the game in Word format and dive straight into the scenarios. It’s a hands-on way to explore the activities and put your learning into practice while we put the finishing touches on the interactive version. Simply click this banner to get started.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.

The EPC’s Inclusive Employability Toolkit is supported by Canterbury Christ Church University, Equal Engineers, The Royal Academy of Engineering, and Wrexham University. This resource is designed to help engineering educators integrate EDI principles and practices in engineering, computing, design and technology – across education, employer engagement, career preparation, and progression into the workplace.

 

Introduction 

This resource was formerly known as the EDGE Toolkit, and was developed in partnership with Canterbury Christ Church University, Wrexham University, Equal Engineers and The Royal Academy of Engineering. The two Universities have now joined forces with the Engineering Professors Council to launch the newly renamed Inclusive Employability Toolkit, working together to improve usability and ensure broader access to this valuable resource. 

The Inclusive Employability Toolkit supports inclusive employment in engineering, computing, design, and technology, enhancing diversity and authentic voices in the workplace. 

Our commitment to fostering an environment where every individual feels valued and empowered has led us to develop the Inclusive Employability Toolkit. This comprehensive toolkit is designed to guide students, faculty, and staff in understanding and practicing EDI principles, ensuring that our campus is a place where diversity thrives and every voice is heard. 

The Inclusive Employability Toolkit is more than just a set of resources – it’s a commitment to continuous learning, understanding, and action. We invite you to explore the toolkit, participate in the activities, and engage with the wealth of available resources. Together, we can build an engineering community that truly reflects the world’s diversity, united in our pursuit of equity and inclusion. 

Begin by exploring this page; it provides a comprehensive background on the importance of EDI in the world of engineering and sets the stage for your learning journey. 

 

Welcome 

The world is incredibly diverse, but navigating the complexities of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) can be challenging, especially for minority groups who face significant hurdles. In the video below, Professor Anne Nortcliffe invites you to explore the Inclusive Employability Toolkit, offering guidance on how to make the most of its features and resources. 

 

The Inclusive Employability Toolkit aims to

 

Contents 

How to use this toolkit effectively:  

Embarking on your journey through Inclusive Employability Toolkit is a step towards fostering an inclusive and diverse environment within the engineering community. This guide will help you navigate the toolkit, ensuring you make the most of the resources, challenges, and learning opportunities it offers. 

 

Goals

🌍 Diversity matters: The toolkit emphasizes that diverse voices enrich the workplace, offering unique perspectives that drive innovation and creativity.
💪 Empowering students: By focusing on technical students, the toolkit equips them with the skills and confidence to navigate their career paths successfully.
🎤 Encouraging authenticity: Bringing your authentic voice to work fosters an environment of trust and openness, leading to stronger team dynamics.
🤝 Role of allies: Supporting individuals from minority backgrounds (female, LGBTQ, disabled, mature, low socio-economic status, global majority) not only aids their success but enriches the workplace culture for everyone involved.
📈 Business impact: Companies that prioritise equity and inclusion see improved employee retention and higher morale, translating into better performance metrics.
🛠️ Better solutions: Diverse teams in engineering and technology are proven to develop more effective solutions, addressing a wider range of needs and challenges.
🏛️ Societal benefits: Promoting equity and inclusion not only benefits organisations but also contributes to a more just and equitable society overall. 

 

Licensing

To ensure that everyone can use and adapt the toolkit in a way that best fits their teaching or purpose, most of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Under this licence you are free to share and adapt this material, under terms that you must give appropriate credit and attribution to the original material and indicate if any changes are made.

 

Further details

CommitmentOur roleWhat we knowChallenges in the industryIndustry EmployersStudent feedback

To leading the charge in creating new opportunities for diversity and inclusion of engineering, technology and design to address regional skills gap. Our vision for all engineering, technology and design students regardless of their background have opportunity to thrive in engineering, technology and design industry.


As game changers we have researched and developed the Inclusive Employability Toolkit to empower students and employers in building bridges between academia, students, and industry to enable gainful graduate employment and more inclusive, dynamic, and diverse opportunities in engineering, technology and design.

A higher proportion of Global Majority and low socioeconomic students’ study at Post-92 universities, and yet, employment outcomes for graduates from these universities often lag behind their Russell Group peers.

Ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic factors continue to shape the employability landscape However more inclusive engineering, technology and design teams create better solutions to problems for all of society.

Gain insights from industry employers as they discuss the toolkit and its impact.


Gain insights from students as they reflect on the usefulness and impact of the toolkit.


Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.   

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Let us know what you think of our website