Toolkit: Complex Systems Toolkit.

Author: Mariam Makramalla, PhD, FRSA (New Giza University).

Topic: Integrating complex systems learning outcomes in engineering curricula.

Title: How to scaffold complex systems learning outcomes across a curriculum.

Resource type: Guidance article.

Relevant disciplines: Any.

Keywords: Learning outcomes; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Curriculum map; Critical thinking; Problem-solving; Life cycle; Decision-making . 

Licensing: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

Downloads:

Who is this article for?: This article should be read by educators at all levels of higher education looking to embed and integrate complex systems topics into curriculum, module, and / or programme design.   

 

Premise:  

Teaching and learning engineering carries with it a double layer of complexity. On the one hand, this complexity is connected to the growing interdisciplinary nature of engineering itself. On the other hand, the complexity is connected to the growing diversity of engineering students that are often present in one project team. This multifaceted complexity requires a re-envisioned understanding of the role and purpose of the engineering educator.  

With the growing trend of a global classroom reality, we often find that learners in the classroom are representing different cultures, which in turn are rooted in them unconsciously carrying historical and socio-cultural baggage relating to these cultures. Thus, it becomes crucial to unpack the challenge and potential that such a diverse collective intelligence can offer to an engineering learning experience.  

As our understanding of the engineering discipline gets more rooted and interconnected with the precarious reality that our world is witnessing today, it becomes essential that the engineering education community would take up a proactive role in actively contributing to the formation of engineering citizenship. In other words, every engineering student should be educated as a citizen that has mastered the engineering cross-cutting fields in such a way that they are free to create and solve problems of the present and the future.  

With this in mind, it becomes very clear that the one-size-fits all model of a single discipline engineering classroom can no longer sustain itself. It does not factor in the richness that a diverse student body can offer, and it dilutes the value and potential of an engineering learner to think clearly or solve problems. It is therefore imperative that engineering educators grasp the complex reality of an integrated engineering discipline and address it in a way that fosters scaffolding of diverse knowledge. Some students might specialise in one core technical discipline. Yet, future projections for most students showcase the need to have a wide level of exposure to broader competency development. Students need to learn to understand the field of engineering at large and to develop system thinking skills that enable them to exist, challenge and have an impact on the system that they are a part of.  

 

How to scaffold learning outcomes in a complex engineering curriculum:

The below table has been designed for embedding Complex Systems Learning Outcomes across an engineering curriculum. It maps against competencies and suggests scaffolding techniques across educational levels. It is also important to note, that efforts need to be made to align to the relevant AHEP requirements or other accreditation standards. Table 1 presents the different strands of the Complex Systems Engineering Curriculum, colour coded in line with the INCOSE Competency Framework outline (INCOSE, 2025). Table 2 presents a practical guide for educators to scaffold Complex Systems learning outcomes across a curriculum. The intention is for the scaffolding framework to compare the trade-offs between different elements of the competency group. For example, system modelling and analysis as an element from the core competency and planning from the management competency. The table suggests activities that would integrate different competencies together in a scaffolded approach.  

Table 1. Competency Areas for Complex Systems (INCOSE, 2025).

Table 1 presents Competency Areas for Complex Systems. As mentioned, the skills range to include a wide variety of competencies, thereby enabling a solid and grounded systems thinking approach for students. As students approach their learning, they go through a series of development stages that gradually build up student level of expertise until they reach the stage of what the INCOSE competency framework refers to as a lead practitioner role. Building on the competencies of the complex system toolkit presented in Table 1, Table 2 presents a potential outline for a scaffolding framework that maps varying threads of the framework in a way that enables scaffolded activities at every developmental stage for learners. Depending on the learning context and educational level, educators can choose which level of attainment is appropriate to their curriculum.  

Table 2. Scaffolding Complex Systems Learning Outcomes across the curriculum 

 

Discussion and next steps:

As we are approaching the fuzzy front end to complexity in engineering pedagogy, as educators we need to be constantly toggling between devising frameworks, being informed by literature, contextualising ideas, validating these in our classrooms and repeating this cycle to continually fine-tune our complex teaching navigational complexity framework. The invitation is open for all educators who would like to connect as we continue to explore different ways of developing responsible engineers who leave a lasting and sustainable mark transforming their stationed realities.  

 

References:

   

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.  

 

A series of new How-To Guides have been developed by universities across the UK as part of the Royal Academy of Engineering’s (RAEng) Diversity Impact Programme (DIP)

Supported by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, this programme funds projects that inspire change within university engineering departments and tackle unequal outcomes experienced by students from underrepresented groups.

Over the past three years, the Diversity Impact Programme has provided grants of up to £100,000 to 22 university projects. The latest phase focuses on sharing what has been learned through practical, evidence-based How-To Guides that other universities can replicate to embed inclusive practices and strengthen outcomes for all engineering students.

 

Funded awardees and their guides

Seven awardees have produced user-friendly guides on inclusive approaches within engineering education:

 

Our guide

We’re proud that our recently published guide, Integrating the Engineering Professors’ Council’s Inclusive Employability Toolkit into the Higher Education Engineering Curriculum (featured in our Inclusive Employability Toolkit), was developed in collaboration with Wrexham University, one of our Toolkit supporters alongside Canterbury Christ Church University, Equal Engineers, and The Royal Academy of Engineering. Through DIP funding, Wrexham University collaborated with us to develop a How-To Guide demonstrating how to use the Toolkit in practice, featuring real-world case studies of students and educators applying it and detailed session plans. This collaboration has enabled us to share practical, scalable strategies that advance inclusive employability within engineering education. We’re delighted to be featured alongside other outstanding contributions from Swansea University, University of Plymouth, King’s College London, University of Dundee, University of Strathclyde, and University of the West of England.

 

Explore the guides

We encourage our members and partners to explore the other awardees’ guides to see how their insights and approaches could inform your own practice. Visit the RAEng website to view all the How-To Guides by clicking here.

 

This post is also available here.

Authors: Professor Anne Nortcliffe (Wrexham University); Crystal Nwagboso (Engineering Professors’ Council).

Topic: A practical guide for educators on using the Toolkit to embed inclusive employability in teaching, illustrated with real-life case studies and step-by-step session plans.

Engineering disciplines: Any.

Keywords: Academics; Active Learning; Case Study; Employability and Skills; Curriculum or Course; Engineering Professionals; Inclusive or Responsible Design; Interdisciplinary or Multidisciplinary; Pedagogy; Problem-Based Learning; Project-Based Learning; Students; Teaching and Learning; Workshop; Collaboration; Higher Education; General and Non-Specific or Other Engineering; Equity, Diversity and Inclusion

Who is this how-to guide / case study for? This guide is designed for educators, curriculum developers, and academic support staff seeking to integrate inclusive employability into engineering education. Through real-world case studies and detailed session plans, it provides practical strategies for fostering students’ professional skills, reflective practice, and meaningful engagement with industry, adaptable across diverse engineering disciplines and teaching contexts.

 

Download the How-To Guide (PDF):

English

Welsh

Objectives: To equip learners with the skills to successfully navigate digital and traditional recruitment processes for engineering roles. This includes demonstrating EDI, technical, and employability skills using the STAR framework; tailoring CVs for AI and Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS); and preparing for aptitude and abstract reasoning tests through targeted practice to enhance problem-solving and analytical abilities.

Introduction: Large national and international employers use digital application processes to recruit graduates. These digital applications aim to capture personal details, education, and work experience. Reflect on your experiences to demonstrate your EDI, employability, and technical skills applied using the STAR (Situation, Technique, Action, and Result) framework. Smaller and medium enterprises typically seek cover letters and CVs. 

Topic: Navigating digital recruitment in engineering: CVs, AI, and aptitude tests.

Keywords: Equity Diversity and Inclusion; Employability and skills; Problem solving; Assessment criteria or methods and tools; CVs and cover letters; Digitalisation; Artificial intelligence; Information and Digital literacy; Communication; Technical integration; Writing skills; Inclusive or Responsible design; Neurodiversity; Curriculum or Course; Computer science; Computing; Engineering professionals; Professional development; Recruitment; Digital engineering tools; Business or trade or industry; Workplace culture

 

Master the art of applying for engineering computing jobs

In the video below, Professor Anne Nortcliffe explains how to develop expertise in securing engineering computing positions by demonstrating technical proficiency and employability skills through well-supported, evidence-based responses.

Video summary:

Master the art of applying for engineering computing jobs by showcasing both technical and employability skills through evidence-based responses. 

Key insights:

⚙️AI in hiring: Understanding that many companies use AI for initial screenings emphasizes the need for clear, evidence-based answers in applications. 

✏️Individual contributions: Highlighting personal achievements rather than team efforts showcases leadership and initiative, key traits employers seek. 

💡Interpersonal skills: Employers value teamwork and leadership; demonstrating how you’ve influenced others highlights your potential as a valuable team member. 

💬Diversity matters: Bringing unique social perspectives into projects can lead to more inclusive solutions, making your application stand out. 

⭐STAR methodology: Using the STAR method helps structure your experiences into compelling narratives, making it easier for employers to assess your qualifications. 

🗒️Tailored applications: Customising your CV and cover letter for each job application reflects your genuine interest and ensures relevance to the employer’s needs. 

📚Professional etiquette: Ending your application with gratitude and a clear call to action maintains professionalism and shows your enthusiasm for the role. 

 

AI and Applications

To navigate digital recruitment, it’s crucial to understand AI’s role in candidate screening. Tailor your CV to pass AI and Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) using resources that provide insights into keywords, formatting, and strategies. This enhances your visibility and competitiveness in the digital recruitment process. 

Further links to look at:

Please note that after clicking these links, you will need to create a free account on the external website to access the materials.

 

CV and Covering Letter

CV templates to support students and graduates to stand out and highlight their engineering and technology capabilities, especially when applying to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) that do not use AI recruitment tools.

  1. CV template – Word 
  2. CV template – Publisher 
  3. CV template – Publisher with Advice 

For applications to large corporations that use AI recruitment tools, it is recommended:

 

Aptitude and Abstract Reasoning Test 

If your digital application is successful you will be typically invited to complete an aptitude and abstract reasoning tests to evaluate candidates. To excel, practice brain training exercises and brain teasers to enhance problem-solving, critical thinking, and analytical skills. Regular practice with similar questions boosts confidence and performance, improving your chances of passing these tests and standing out in the recruitment process. 

Further links to look at:

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.


Objectives: This activity amplifies the stories of underrepresented individuals overcoming barriers in their careers, highlighting resilience, diversity, and inclusion. This challenge aims to inspire action and illustrate how diversity drives innovation and growth. By sharing success stories from diverse engineering professionals, we aim to motivate and guide students on similar paths.

Introduction: Voices of Change is an activity designed to highlight the powerful stories of underrepresented individuals in engineering and STEM. Through a collection of personal narratives, including those of Black researchers, this resource showcases the challenges they’ve overcome, the contributions they’ve made, and the importance of diversity in driving innovation. By exploring these stories, students are encouraged to reflect on issues of equity and inclusion, gain insight into diverse career pathways, and feel empowered to pursue their own ambitions within an inclusive engineering community.

Topic: Inspiring diversity and resilience: stories of underrepresented engineers driving innovation and inclusion.

Keywords: Equity, Diversity and Inclusion; Students; Employability and skills; Mentoring; Job or career impact; Early careers; Higher education institutions; Engineering professionals; Curriculum or course; Social responsibility; Societal impact; Corporate social responsibility; Apprenticeships or work based learning; Personal or professional reputation

 

Voices of change

IntroductionJanetLeonetteSamuelLewisLeonPurvi

Click on each accordion tab to discover inspiring success stories from a diverse range of engineering professionals, showcasing their journeys and achievements. Let their experiences motivate and empower you to reach new heights in your career.

Video summary:

Janet shares her journey from a hesitant industry worker to a successful engineer, highlighting the importance of education, networking, and self-improvement. 

Key insights:

🚀 Career transformation: Janet’s shift from a technical operator to an engineer illustrates the potential for personal and professional growth through unexpected opportunities. Her journey shows that initial discomfort can lead to fulfilling careers. 

📚 Importance of education: Pursuing further education, such as her BTech and bachelor’s degree, was crucial for Janet. This highlights the value of continuous learning in adapting to industry demands and personal aspirations. 

🤝 Networking matters: Joining groups like “Women in STEM” helped Janet connect with others and gain valuable insights. Networking can provide support and open doors in competitive fields. 

💡 Embrace uniqueness: Janet’s willingness to present herself authentically during interviews exemplifies how being true to oneself can set candidates apart and lead to unexpected success. 

🌱 Growth mindset: Janet’s commitment to continuous improvement and lifelong learning reflects a growth mindset that is essential in rapidly evolving industries, showcasing that education is an ongoing journey. 

👩‍🔧 Advocacy for diversity: Janet’s observations about the lack of female engineers in her workplace highlight the need for diversity. Her passion for inclusivity can inspire change and encourage young women to pursue engineering careers. 

🛠️ Real-world experience: Janet’s technical background provided her with practical skills that helped in job interviews. This emphasiszes the importance of gaining hands-on experience in any field, as it can enhance employability and confidence

Video summary:

Leonette emphasizes the importance of networking and mentorship in her journey from chemical engineering to data science, highlighting diversity and empowerment.

Key insights:

🤝 The power of networking: Building professional relationships can significantly enhance job prospects. Networking opens doors that might otherwise remain closed.

🎓 Mentorship impact: Guidance from mentors, such as professors, can provide invaluable insights and job referrals in your field.

💬 Active engagement: Participating in events and volunteering fosters visibility and rapport with key industry players.

🌈 Diversity matters: A commitment to diversity and inclusion can drive positive change in the workplace and society.

🌟 Role model influence: Being a visible success for underrepresented groups can inspire future generations to pursue their dreams.

🌱 Empowerment through change: Actively working to reduce gaps in representation fuels personal motivation and broader societal progress.

🛡️ Resilience is key: Perseverance through challenges is essential for long-term success and personal growth.

Video summary:

Samuel is a biomedical engineering graduate from Canterbury Christ Church University, emphasizes the importance of EDI in engineering and shares his experiences at ICU Medical.  

Key insights:

🎓 Education’s role in EDI: Samuel’s education at Canterbury Christ Church University shaped his understanding of equality, diversity, and inclusion, highlighting how universities can instil these values early on. 

💼 Career impact: Working at ICU Medical, Samuel experiences first-hand how EDI initiatives can create a supportive work environment, demonstrating EDI’s influence on professional development. 

🌍 Importance of EDI events: By participating in EDI events, organisations can foster a culture of inclusion, encouraging diverse participation in engineering fields. 

🤝 Diversity in problem-solving: Different perspectives lead to innovative solutions, proving that EDI is crucial for effective teamwork and project success in engineering. 

🗣️ Listening to diverse voices: Brooks emphasizes the significance of hearing different viewpoints, suggesting that diversity in thought is essential for addressing complex challenges. 

📈 Future of EDI: The need for increased awareness and opportunities in EDI is vital for fostering an inclusive environment, ensuring everyone has equal chances for success. 

🌟 Organisational responsibility: Companies should prioritise creating EDI teams and strategies, making inclusivity a fundamental part of their operational framework. 

Video summary:

Lewis a former transport manager, transitioned to teaching computer science, aiming to inspire diverse students in computing and engineering fields.  

Key insights:

🚀 Diverse backgrounds enhance innovation: Engaging individuals from various backgrounds can lead to more innovative solutions in tech. Diverse teams bring different perspectives, critical for problem-solving in engineering and computing. 

🏫 Importance of early education: Introducing computing concepts at a young age can inspire future interest and career paths among students. Early exposure is key to nurturing talent from diverse demographics. 

🔍 Awareness of gender & racial gaps: Understanding existing disparities in education allows educators to implement targeted strategies. 

Video summary:  

Leon is a Computing graduate from East London, is a grassroots football coach passionate about technology and inclusivity in sports. 

Key insights  

🌐 Diversity and inclusion: Leon highlights the importance of fostering an inclusive environment in sports, which can positively influence players’ development and teamwork. Embracing diversity enriches the community within the club. 

⚽ Passion for football: His love for football not only drives his coaching but also builds resilience. The challenges faced in sports translate into valuable life lessons applicable in various contexts. 

💡 Technology enthusiasm: Leon’s interest in technology reflects a growing trend where tech plays a crucial role in sports and society, indicating the need for professionals to adapt and innovate. 

🛠️ Work-life balance: By learning to separate work from personal life, Leon emphasizes self-care, which is essential for maintaining mental health and productivity in high-pressure environments. 

Video summary:

Final-year mechanical engineering student Purvi shares insights on job offers, the value of practical experience, and leadership skills from his projects. 

Key insights:

🎓 Practical experience matters: Purvi emphasized that hands-on experience, such as internships and projects, can set candidates apart in competitive industries. This underscores the importance of seeking practical opportunities during academic studies. 

🚀 Diverse skill application: The realisation that skills from various experiences, not just academic knowledge, can be leveraged in interviews showcases the value of a well-rounded background in job applications. 

🔍 Importance of leadership: Participation in projects like the Formula Student provided Purvi with leadership experiences that he effectively communicated during interviews. This highlights how extracurricular activities can enhance employability. 

⚖️ Health and safety knowledge: Understanding industry-specific regulations, such as health and safety in aviation and defence, can significantly strengthen a candidate’s position in interviews, demonstrating readiness for real-world challenges. 

🤝 Support systems matter: Purvi’s positive experience with university support in navigating job offers illustrates the role of academic institutions in preparing students for the workforce. 

🌟 Expectations vs. reality: The contrast between Purvi’s initial expectations of the industry and the actual diversity he encountered suggests a shift in perception is possible through direct experience. 

📈 Utilising unique skills: Purvi’s insight that uniqueness stems from skill utilisation rather than background alone promotes the notion that every candidate has something valuable to offer, regardless of their starting point. 

 

Stories of Black Researchers in STEM

Explore the inspiring journeys of Black researchers in STEM, highlighting their achievements and contributions despite challenges. Their stories showcase resilience and the vital role of diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Initiatives like #BlackBirdersWeek and #BlackInSciComm emphasize the importance of community and representation, celebrating successes while addressing systemic obstacles.

Explore these narratives and learn more about the experiences of Black researchers in STEM through Science News’ feature on the diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts within the science community.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.


Objectives: This activity aims to raise awareness of language’s impact in professional settings, particularly for underrepresented groups. Students will explore verbal and non-verbal communication to foster an inclusive environment. Students will receive strategies for handling challenging situations and building confidence in interactions with leaders, and managing conflicts.

Introduction: This activity explores how language, both verbal and non-verbal, impacts professional settings, particularly for underrepresented groups. Through video insights and practical strategies, students will learn to navigate difficult conversations, address microaggressions, and build confidence in communicating with leaders. The activity also highlights the role of gendered language in interviews and recruitment, encouraging inclusive and self-aware communication in the workplace.

Topic: Building confidence and inclusion through mindful communication in the workplace.

Keywords: Equity, Diversity and Inclusion; Communication; Students; Mentoring; Job or career impact; Early careers; Engineering professionals; Curriculum or course; Personal or professional reputation; Societal impact; Social responsibility; Corporate social responsibility; Higher education institutions; Apprenticeships or work based learning; Leadership or management; Gender.

 

Navigating difficult workplace conversations 

In the video below, Abisola Ajani, a process technology engineer and founder of BW, highlights the critical role of communication skills in effectively navigating challenging workplace conversations.

Video summary: 

Abisola Ajani, a process technology engineer and founder of BW, emphasises the importance of skills for navigating difficult workplace conversations. 

Key insights:

💡 Importance of communication skills: Effective communication in engineering helps convey expertise and resolve conflicts, making it vital for career success. 

⏸️ Power of pausing: Taking a moment to pause during tough conversations allows for clearer thinking and more productive responses, promoting better outcomes. 

🤝 Role of mentorship: Seeking guidance from mentors equips individuals with strategies and confidence to tackle challenging discussions, enhancing professional growth. 

🤔 Valuing past experiences: Skills gained from previous jobs, even in unrelated fields, can be leveraged in engineering roles, demonstrating that every experience contributes to personal development. 

✨ Growth through mistakes: Embracing the inevitability of mistakes in difficult conversations encourages continuous improvement and resilience in professional settings. 

🌍 Diversity and inclusion: An inclusive environment empowers individuals to express their authentic selves, leading to greater innovation and collaboration within teams. 

💪 Empowerment through visibility: Initiatives like BW highlight the importance of representation in engineering, inspiring future generations of diverse engineers to thrive. 

 

 

Resources: 

Thriving Together Series:  Strengthening Diversity and Inclusion through Communication 

This resource emphasizes communication’s role in fostering diversity and inclusion at work. It covers: 

 

 

“I” versus “We” 

Interviews can be stressful, often reinforcing learned gender habits in language use. Women tend to use “We” instead of “I” for work they have done, and use hedge words like “think” due to societal expectations of modesty and humility. Men, on the other hand, typically use “I” and fewer hedge words, reflecting societal norms of assertiveness and leadership. 

If you catch yourself using “We” when you mean “I,” pause and correct it, but explain it’s a habit from societal norms. Both “We” and “I” answers are important: “We” for teamwork, “I” for leadership and initiative. 

Employers we recommend you recognise that “We” and “I” can be interchangeable for many women and some cultures, and understand the biases involved. 

 

 

Gender Decoder

The Gender Decoder analyses job descriptions to identify and correct gendered language, promoting gender-neutrality and inclusivity in recruitment. Try it to see how small language changes can foster a more inclusive work environment. 

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.

The EPC’s Inclusive Employability Toolkit is supported by Canterbury Christ Church University, Equal Engineers, The Royal Academy of Engineering, and Wrexham University. This resource is designed to help engineering educators integrate EDI principles and practices in engineering, computing, design and technology – across education, employer engagement, career preparation, and progression into the workplace.

 

Introduction 

This resource was formerly known as the EDGE Toolkit, and was developed in partnership with Canterbury Christ Church University, Wrexham University, Equal Engineers and The Royal Academy of Engineering. The two Universities have now joined forces with the Engineering Professors Council to launch the newly renamed Inclusive Employability Toolkit, working together to improve usability and ensure broader access to this valuable resource. 

The Inclusive Employability Toolkit supports inclusive employment in engineering, computing, design, and technology, enhancing diversity and authentic voices in the workplace. 

Our commitment to fostering an environment where every individual feels valued and empowered has led us to develop the Inclusive Employability Toolkit. This comprehensive toolkit is designed to guide students, faculty, and staff in understanding and practicing EDI principles, ensuring that our campus is a place where diversity thrives and every voice is heard. 

The Inclusive Employability Toolkit is more than just a set of resources – it’s a commitment to continuous learning, understanding, and action. We invite you to explore the toolkit, participate in the activities, and engage with the wealth of available resources. Together, we can build an engineering community that truly reflects the world’s diversity, united in our pursuit of equity and inclusion. 

Begin by exploring this page; it provides a comprehensive background on the importance of EDI in the world of engineering and sets the stage for your learning journey. 

 

Welcome 

The world is incredibly diverse, but navigating the complexities of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) can be challenging, especially for minority groups who face significant hurdles. In the video below, Professor Anne Nortcliffe invites you to explore the Inclusive Employability Toolkit, offering guidance on how to make the most of its features and resources. 

 

The Inclusive Employability Toolkit aims to

 

Contents 

How to use this toolkit effectively:  

Embarking on your journey through Inclusive Employability Toolkit is a step towards fostering an inclusive and diverse environment within the engineering community. This guide will help you navigate the toolkit, ensuring you make the most of the resources, challenges, and learning opportunities it offers. 

 

Goals

🌍 Diversity matters: The toolkit emphasizes that diverse voices enrich the workplace, offering unique perspectives that drive innovation and creativity.
💪 Empowering students: By focusing on technical students, the toolkit equips them with the skills and confidence to navigate their career paths successfully.
🎤 Encouraging authenticity: Bringing your authentic voice to work fosters an environment of trust and openness, leading to stronger team dynamics.
🤝 Role of allies: Supporting individuals from minority backgrounds (female, LGBTQ, disabled, mature, low socio-economic status, global majority) not only aids their success but enriches the workplace culture for everyone involved.
📈 Business impact: Companies that prioritise equity and inclusion see improved employee retention and higher morale, translating into better performance metrics.
🛠️ Better solutions: Diverse teams in engineering and technology are proven to develop more effective solutions, addressing a wider range of needs and challenges.
🏛️ Societal benefits: Promoting equity and inclusion not only benefits organisations but also contributes to a more just and equitable society overall. 

 

Licensing

To ensure that everyone can use and adapt the toolkit in a way that best fits their teaching or purpose, most of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Under this licence you are free to share and adapt this material, under terms that you must give appropriate credit and attribution to the original material and indicate if any changes are made.

 

Further details

CommitmentOur roleWhat we knowChallenges in the industryIndustry EmployersStudent feedback

To leading the charge in creating new opportunities for diversity and inclusion of engineering, technology and design to address regional skills gap. Our vision for all engineering, technology and design students regardless of their background have opportunity to thrive in engineering, technology and design industry.


As game changers we have researched and developed the Inclusive Employability Toolkit to empower students and employers in building bridges between academia, students, and industry to enable gainful graduate employment and more inclusive, dynamic, and diverse opportunities in engineering, technology and design.

A higher proportion of Global Majority and low socioeconomic students’ study at Post-92 universities, and yet, employment outcomes for graduates from these universities often lag behind their Russell Group peers.

Ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic factors continue to shape the employability landscape However more inclusive engineering, technology and design teams create better solutions to problems for all of society.

Gain insights from industry employers as they discuss the toolkit and its impact.


Gain insights from students as they reflect on the usefulness and impact of the toolkit.


Please note: Discussions around discrimination, prejudice and bias are highly complex and part of a much wider national and international debate, including contested histories. As such, we have limited the scope of our resources to educating and supporting students.

The resources that the EPC and its partners are producing in this area will continue to expand and, if you feel there is an issue that is currently underrepresented in our content, we would be delighted to work with you to create more. Please get in touch.   

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Authors: Dr. Kieran Higgins(Ulster University); Dr. Alison Calvert (Queen’s University Belfast).

Topic: Integrating Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) into higher education curricula.

Type: Guidance

Relevant disciplines: Any.

Keywords: Curriculum design; Global responsibility; Sustainability; SDGs; Course design; Higher education; Pedagogy;

Sustainability competency: Anticipatory; Integrated problem-solving; Strategic; Systems thinking.

Related SDGs: SDG 4 (Quality education); SDG 13 (Climate action).

Reimagined Degree Map Intervention: Adapt and repurpose learning outcomes; Authentic assessment; Active pedagogies and mindset development.

Who is this article for?:  This article should be read by educators at all levels of higher education looking to embed and integrate ESD into curriculum, module, and / or programme design.

Link to resource: AdvanceHE’s Education for Sustainable Development Curriculum Design Toolkit

 

Learning and Teaching Notes:
Supported by AdvanceHE, this Toolkit provides a structured approach to integrating Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) into higher education curricula. It uses the CRAFTS methodology and empowers educators to enhance their modules and programs with sustainability competencies aligned with UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Key Features:
• Five-Phase Process: Analyse stakeholder needs, map current provision, reflect on opportunities for development, redesign with an ESD focus, and create an action plan for continuous enhancement.
• Practical Tools: Includes templates for stakeholder analysis, module planning, active learning activities, and evaluation.
• Flexible Implementation: Designed for use at both module and programme level.
• Competency-Based: Focuses on developing authentic learning experiences across cognitive, socio-emotional, and behavioural domains.

Benefits
• Identify stakeholder sustainability needs
• Map existing ESD elements in your curriculum
• Reflect on opportunities to enhance ESD integration
• Redesign modules with active learning approaches of ESD
• Create actionable plans for implementation and evaluation

Click here to access the Toolkit.

Read more here.

 

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters. 

Authors: Dr. Kieran Higgins (Ulster University); Dr. Alison Calvert (Queen’s University Belfast).

Keywords: Curriculum design; Global responsibility; Sustainability; SDGs; Course design; Higher education; Pedagogy.

Who is this article for?: This article should be read by module coordinators, programme directors, and teaching teams in higher education who want to meaningfully integrate ESD into their curriculum design and delivery.

 

It’s always a struggle to get started on something new in the time- and resource-poor environment that is higher education. Sustainability can become just another box to tick rather than the world-changing priority it should be.

That’s why we have created the Education for Sustainable Development Curriculum Design Toolkit to build sustainability into the curriculum in a way that stimulates the critical reflection it needs to truly embed it within modules.

We knew there was more to ESD than simply labelling a module handbook with the SDG logos, especially when it was only SDG4 because it happens to mention education. There was a need to become familiar and comfortable with a deeper perspective on the SDGs and their related targets and indicators – without becoming intimidated by them. ESD should prepare students to tackle unforeseen challenges and navigate complex systems, rather than focusing on content alone. As higher education professionals, we recognised the inherent challenges of this.

As a result, we developed our CRAFTS (Co-Designing Reflective Approaches for the Teaching of Sustainability) model of curriculum design, based on an adaptation of Design Thinking, to provide a structured and usable, yet accessible, flexible, and not discipline-specific means of embedding and embodying ESD in the curriculum. We were then approached by AdvanceHE to develop this further into a practical, systematic resource that would empower educators to take genuine ownership of sustainability in their teaching and assessment.

The Toolkit helps tackle these issues in a straightforward way by breaking them down into five stages.

First, it shows how to analyse what stakeholders like students, employers and accrediting bodies want and need from a module when it comes to sustainability.

Then, it guides educators to map exactly what is being taught as the curriculum stands, aligning it to the SDGs and the ESD Competencies. This is a moment of real relief for many people, who discover that much of what they already do aligns perfectly with ESD.

After that, there’s a guided reflection to see where stronger integration might happen or where superficial coverage can be expanded into something more meaningful.

The redesign process helps to embed active learning and authentic assessments and finishes off with an action plan for moving forward and measuring impact for future evaluation.

We find it heartening to watch colleagues pivot from feeling like ESD is an add-on to realising it can enhance what they already do. Instead of worrying that they must become experts in every single SDG, the Toolkit reminds them that authentic engagement with a few well-chosen goals can lead to the deeper kind of learning we all aspire to provide.

This personal, reflective approach has helped academics overcome the sense that sustainability in the curriculum is an overwhelming requirement. They see it as a powerful lens through which students learn to handle uncertainty, become resilient critical thinkers and gain the confidence to tackle real-world problems.

We hope the Toolkit continues to spark conversations and encourage more creative approaches to ESD across disciplines. We don’t believe there’s a one-size-fits-all solution. It has been inspiring to see colleagues reclaim that sense of possibility and excitement, reassured that teaching for a sustainable future can be woven into what they’re already doing – just with an extra layer of intentionality and reflection.

If you’re looking for a way to bring ESD into your own classroom, we hope the Toolkit will be a reliable companion on that journey.

Dr Kieran Higgins (Lecturer in Higher Education Practice, Ulster University) and Dr Alison Calvert (Senior Lecturer in Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast) have collaborated on Education for Sustainable Development projects for over 4 years, drawing on extensive and wide ranging experiences of higher education and sustainability. Their vision is of transformed global higher education curricula that empowers all graduates, regardless of discipline or career path, to become champions of a sustainable future.

 

This post is also available here.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters. 

Case study example: Water wars: managing competing water rights

Activity: Assessment. This example demonstrates how the questions provided in Assessing ethics: Rubric can be used to assess the competencies stipulated at each level.

Authors: Dr. Natalie Wint (UCL); Dr. William Bennett (Swansea University).

Related content:

 

Water wars: managing competing water rights 

This example demonstrates how the questions provided in the accompanying rubric can be used to assess the competencies stipulated at each level. Although we have focused on ‘Water Wars’ here, the suggested assessment questions have been designed in such a way that they can be used in conjunction with the case studies available within the toolkit, or with another case study that has been created (by yourself or elsewhere) to outline an ethical dilemma. 

Year 1 

Personal values: What is your initial position on the issue? Do you see anything wrong with how DSS are using water? Why, or why not?

Professional responsibilities: What ethical principles and codes of conduct are relevant to this situation?

Ethical principles and codes of conduct can be used to guide our actions during an ethical dilemma. How does the guidance provided in this case align/differ with your personal views? (This is a question we had created in addition to those provided within the case study to meet the requirements stipulated in the accompanying rubric.)

What are the moral values involved in this case and why does it constitute an ethical dilemma? (This is a question we had created in addition to those provided within the case study to meet the requirements stipulated in the accompanying rubric.)

What role should an engineer play in influencing the outcome? What are the implications of not being involved? (This is a question we had created in addition to those provided within the case study to meet the requirements stipulated in the accompanying rubric.)

Year 2 

Formulate a moral problem statement which clearly states the problem, its moral nature and who needs to act. (This is a question we had created in addition to those provided within the case study to meet the requirements stipulated in the accompanying rubric.)

Stakeholder mapping: Who are all the stakeholders in the scenario? What are their positions, perspective and moral values?

Stakeholder  Perspectives/interests  Moral values 
Data Storage Solutions (DSS)  Increasing production in a profitable way; meeting legal requirements; good reputation to maintain/grow customer base.  Accountability; sustainability (primarily economic). 
Farmers’ union  Represent farmers who suffer from economic implications associated with costly irrigation.  Accountability; environmental sustainability; justice. 
Farm  The farm (presumably) benefits from DSS using the land.  Ownership and property; environmental sustainability; justice. 
Local Green Party  Represent views of those concerned about biodiversity. May be interested in opening of green battery plant.  Human welfare; environmental sustainability; justice. 
Local Council  Represent views of all stakeholders and would need to consider economic benefits of DSS (tax and employment), the need of the university and hospital, as well as the needs of local farmers and environmentalists. May be interested in opening of green battery plant.  Human welfare and public health; trust; accountability; environmental sustainability; justice. 
Member of the public  This may depend on their beliefs as an individual, their employment status and their use of services such as the hospital and university. Typically interested in low taxes/responsible spending of public money. May be interested in opening of green battery plant.  Human welfare; trust; accountability; environmental sustainability; justice. 
Stakeholders using DSS data storage  Reliable storage. They may also be interested in being part of an ethical supply chain.  Trust; privacy; accountability; autonomy. 
Non-human stakeholders  Environmental sustainability. 

 

What are some of the possible courses of action in the situation. What responsibilities do you have to the various stakeholders involved? What are some of the advantages and disadvantages associated with each? (Reworded from case study.)

What are the relevant facts in this scenario and what other information would you like to help inform your ethical decision making? (This is a question we had created in addition to those provided within the case study to meet the requirements stipulated in the accompanying rubric.)

 

 

Year 2/Year 3  

(At Year 2, students could provide options; at Year 3 they would evaluate and form a judgement.) 

Make use of ethical frameworks and/or professional codes to evaluate the options for DSS both short term and long term. How do the uncertainty and assumptions involved in this case impact decision making?

Option  Consequences  Intention  Action 
Keep using water  May lead to expansion and profit of DSS and thus tax revenue/employment and supply. 

Reputational damage of DSS may increase. Individual employee piece of mind may be at risk. 

Farmers still don’t have water and biodiversity still suffers which may have further impact long term. 

 Intention behind action not consistent with that expected by an engineer, other than with respect to legality  Action follows legal norms but not social norms such as good will and concern for others. 
Keep using the water but limit further work  May limit expansion and profit of DSS and thus tax revenue/employment and supply. 

Farmers still don’t have water and biodiversity still suffers and may have further impact long term. This could still result in reputation damage. 

 Intention behind action partially consistent with that expected by an engineer.  Action follows legal norms but only partially follow social norms such as good will and concern for others. 
Make use of other sources of water  Data storage continues. 

Potential for reputation to increase. 

Potential increase in cost of water resulting in less profit potentially less tax revenue/employment. 

Farmers have water and biodiversity may improve.

Alternative water sources may be associated with the same issues or worse. 

 Intention behind action seems consistent with that expected by an engineer. However, this is dependent upon 

whether they chose to source sustainable water with less impact on biodiversity etc. 

 This may be dependent on the degree to which DSS proactively source sustainable water. 
Reduce work levels or shut down  Impact on profit and thus tax revenue/employment and supply chain. Farmers have water and biodiversity may improve. 

May cause operational issues for those whose data is stored. 

 Seems consistent with those expected of engineer. Raises questions more generally about viability and feasibility of data storage.  Action doesn’t follow social norms of responsibility to employees and shareholders. 
Investigate other cooling methods which don’t require as much water/don’t take on extra work until another method identified. 
 May benefit whole sector. 

May cause interim loss of service. 

 

 This follows expectations of the engineering profession in terms of evidence-based decision making and consideration for impact of engineering in society.  It follows social norms in terms of responsible decision making. 

 

Downloads:

Assessing ethics: Guidance

Assessing ethics: Rubric

Assessing ethics: Case study assessment example: Water Wars

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Any views, thoughts, and opinions expressed herein are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of the Engineering Professors’ Council or the Toolkit sponsors and supporters.

Let us know what you think of our website