It was clear from our recent Recruitment and Admissions Forum that there is a multiplicity of uses of personal statements and views on their reform within the Engineering Academics network. For this reason, the EPC is not minded to respond to the survey unless we receive strong representation from our members to do so (please contact us).
However, we do invite you to engage with a University of Manchester study led by Tom Fryer (who joined UCAS’ Kim Eccleston and others to debate personal statement reform at our Forum in December) to help identify which questions may be the most appropriate. The proposals have shifted from the position that was advocated by UCAS in the EPC debate just before Christmas, so we like to think engineering’s representation at the Forum was effective.
The EPC remains particularly keen to ensure that any engineering specific nuances are understood by UCAS. For example, do personal statements serve a specific purpose for those applying to a subject they have not studied at school for which there are only proxy (predicted) grades and how is this best served? Please highlight any engineering specific feedback in your response(s).
The survey takes five minutes and is directed at all professionals involved in admissions. If you do not feel you are the right person in your university to complete the survey, please do feel free to forward it.
You can also respond directly to UCAS. The reform is an evolving process, with plans to introduce personal statement questions in 2024 for 2025 entry,